https://en.qelnet.com/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Without_Naskh%3A_Interpreting_the_Qur%E2%80%99an_with_Maq%C4%81%E1%B9%A3idWithout Naskh: Interpreting the Qur’an with Maqāṣid - Revision history2026-07-30T03:18:10ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.44.0https://en.qelnet.com/index.php?title=Without_Naskh:_Interpreting_the_Qur%E2%80%99an_with_Maq%C4%81%E1%B9%A3id&diff=65&oldid=prevAhmed Meiloud: Created page with "=ABSTRACT= For centuries, naskh (abrogation) has played a critical role in Islamic legal philosophy as a unifying rubric through which Muslim scholars accepted the logic of divine law and their relationship to it. However, this paradigm has been challenged by new competing theories of abrogation. This paper has examined five of them: Non-abrogation theory (Muhammad al-Jabri), dialectic theory (Nasr Hamid Abu Zaid), didactic theory (Abdullah Saeed), punitive theory (Muham..."2025-10-31T08:07:48Z<p>Created page with "=ABSTRACT= For centuries, naskh (abrogation) has played a critical role in Islamic legal philosophy as a unifying rubric through which Muslim scholars accepted the logic of divine law and their relationship to it. However, this paradigm has been challenged by new competing theories of abrogation. This paper has examined five of them: Non-abrogation theory (Muhammad al-Jabri), dialectic theory (Nasr Hamid Abu Zaid), didactic theory (Abdullah Saeed), punitive theory (Muham..."</p>
<a href="https://en.qelnet.com/index.php?title=Without_Naskh:_Interpreting_the_Qur%E2%80%99an_with_Maq%C4%81%E1%B9%A3id&diff=65">Show changes</a>Ahmed Meiloud